0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:09:04 EDT 2025
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.21/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.21/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p
0.21/0.51	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.21/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.21/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.21/0.51	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_12 with 240s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_bool_2 with 240s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# post_as_ho3 with pid 11668 completed with status 0
0.21/0.51	# Result found by post_as_ho3
0.21/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.21/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.21/0.51	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.51	# Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
0.21/0.51	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# new_ho_10 with pid 11673 completed with status 0
0.21/0.51	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.21/0.51	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
0.21/0.51	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1200s (5) cores
0.21/0.51	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 240s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# No SInE strategy applied
0.21/0.51	# Search class: HGUNM-FFMF32-SHSSMFNN
0.21/0.51	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.21/0.51	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.21/0.51	# Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
0.21/0.51	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.21/0.51	
0.21/0.51	# Proof found!
0.21/0.51	# SZS status Theorem
0.21/0.51	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_sort1, type, mu: $tType).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_38, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_41, type, msymmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_42, type, mserial: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_50, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_54, type, a1: $i > $i > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_58, type, piotr: mu).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_60, type, pepsi: mu).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_62, type, likes: mu > mu > $i > $o).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_73, type, esk7_0: $i).
0.21/0.51	thf(decl_75, type, esk9_1: $i > $i).
0.21/0.51	thf(msymmetric, axiom, ((msymmetric)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((X13 @ X15 @ X16)=>(X13 @ X16 @ X15)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', msymmetric)).
0.21/0.51	thf(mserial, axiom, ((mserial)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:((X13 @ X15 @ X16)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', mserial)).
0.21/0.51	thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14))|(X6 @ X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', mbox)).
0.21/0.51	thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', mvalid)).
0.21/0.51	thf(axioms_B_a1, axiom, (msymmetric @ a1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', axioms_B_a1)).
0.21/0.51	thf(axioms_D_a1, axiom, (mserial @ a1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', axioms_D_a1)).
0.21/0.51	thf(axiom_a1_2, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a1 @ (likes @ piotr @ pepsi))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', axiom_a1_2)).
0.21/0.51	thf(conj, conjecture, (mvalid @ (likes @ piotr @ pepsi)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ZvABG6Jt1d/E---3.1_11502.p', conj)).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((msymmetric)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i, X16:$i]:(((Z0 @ X15 @ X16)=>(Z0 @ X16 @ X15)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[msymmetric])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((mserial)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:(?[X16:$i]:((Z0 @ X15 @ X16)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mserial])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14))|(Z1 @ X14)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X30:$i, X31:$i]:(((a1 @ X30 @ X31)=>(a1 @ X31 @ X30))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_B_a1, c_0_8])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X127:$i]:(?[X128:$i]:((a1 @ X127 @ X128))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axioms_D_a1, c_0_9])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X55:$i, X54:$i]:((~(a1 @ X55 @ X54)|(likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ X54))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_a1_2, c_0_10]), c_0_11])])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X141:$i, X142:$i]:((~(a1 @ X141 @ X142)|(a1 @ X142 @ X141))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X238:$i]:((a1 @ X238 @ (esk9_1 @ X238))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~(![X114:$i]:((likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ X114))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj]), c_0_11])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X165:$i, X166:$i]:((~(a1 @ X165 @ X166)|(likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ X166))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((a1 @ X14 @ X3)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ X3 @ (esk9_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ~(likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ esk7_0), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ X14)|~((a1 @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X3:$i]:((a1 @ (esk9_1 @ X3) @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ~((likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ esk7_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X3:$i]:((likes @ piotr @ pepsi @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])).
0.21/0.51	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])]), ['proof']).
0.21/0.51	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.21/0.51	# Parsed axioms                        : 118
0.21/0.51	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.21/0.51	# Initial clauses                      : 91
0.21/0.51	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 45
0.21/0.51	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
0.21/0.51	# Processed clauses                    : 70
0.21/0.51	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.21/0.51	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.21/0.51	# ...remaining for further processing  : 68
0.21/0.51	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.21/0.51	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.21/0.51	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.21/0.51	# Backward-rewritten                   : 5
0.21/0.51	# Generated clauses                    : 27
0.21/0.51	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
0.21/0.51	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.21/0.51	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.21/0.51	# Paramodulations                      : 27
0.21/0.51	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.21/0.51	# NegExts                              : 0
0.21/0.51	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.21/0.51	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.21/0.51	# Total rewrite steps                  : 7
0.21/0.51	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.21/0.51	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.21/0.51	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.21/0.51	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.21/0.51	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.21/0.51	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.21/0.51	# Current number of processed clauses  : 19
0.21/0.51	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
0.21/0.51	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.21/0.51	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.21/0.51	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
0.21/0.51	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 45
0.21/0.51	# ...number of literals in the above   : 107
0.21/0.51	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.21/0.51	# Current number of archived clauses   : 49
0.21/0.51	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 124
0.21/0.51	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 67
0.21/0.51	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
0.21/0.51	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.21/0.51	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.21/0.51	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
0.21/0.51	# BW rewrite match successes           : 5
0.21/0.51	# Condensation attempts                : 70
0.21/0.51	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.21/0.51	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 9294
0.21/0.51	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 3139
0.21/0.51	
0.21/0.51	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.51	# User time                : 0.012 s
0.21/0.51	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.21/0.51	# Total time               : 0.017 s
0.21/0.51	# Maximum resident set size: 2416 pages
0.21/0.51	
0.21/0.51	# -------------------------------------------------
0.21/0.51	# User time                : 0.015 s
0.21/0.51	# System time              : 0.007 s
0.21/0.51	# Total time               : 0.022 s
0.21/0.51	# Maximum resident set size: 1832 pages
0.21/0.51	% E exiting
0.21/0.51	% E exiting
0.21/0.51	EOF